- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Nakhichevan uezd
Improved to Good Article status by Olympian (talk). Self-nominated at 11:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Olympian: Great article. This seems to be your first nomination so no QPQ required. However, I don't think that the hook is that interesting. Your hook feels too vague and lacks enough context to be interesting. I feel as if you should either be more specific in the hook you have or create a different hook altogether. Other than that it would be approved. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Hook is better so I'm approving on good faith. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
@Olympian: Great article. This seems to be your first nomination so no QPQ required. However, I don't think that the hook is that interesting. Your hook feels too vague and lacks enough context to be interesting. I feel as if you should either be more specific in the hook you have or create a different hook altogether. Other than that it would be approved. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
