Template:Did you know nominations/Montpelier Crescent; Vernon Terrace, Brighton
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 14:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Montpelier Crescent, Vernon Terrace, Brighton edit
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
,_Brighton.JPG)
- ... that Montpelier Crescent in Brighton was unusually built facing the South Downs instead of the sea—but this view was blocked within ten years by Vernon Terrace (pictured)?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Enrico Glicenstein (which was also a double hook)
- Comment: Both created on 26th. Various images are available in both articles; the one shown here is the best of the "overall" views.
Created/expanded by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self nom at 14:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
I don't see the hook fact "was unusually built facing the South Downs instead of the sea" actually cited or stated in the article - the relevant sentences appear to be "The houses lacked a sea view, as they faced northwest towards the open land of the South Downs. The crescent was completed in 1847; within ten years, the downland vista had been obscured by the construction of Vernon Terrace opposite." - which doesn't state that the siting was unusual. Otherwise, size checked out for both articles, they both were created and posted here within 5 days of their creation - hook is interesting and cited (except for the issue noted above) and of correct size. Image checks out. QPQ has been done. AGF on the sources - they are mostly offline. Does not appear to be a copyrvio from a google search of three sentences from each article. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I needed to include ref [2] in a couple of places. The specific statement was in the Architecture section, but I have reworded and referenced. Diff is here. Cheers, Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 08:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
