The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment: How long has it been since we last had a video DYK? I think the video here is the main draw, so I'd definitely like to see it appear with the hook. |thumbtime=60 should be set so that it's showing the dance rather than the musicians (I've made a relevant technical request). I'm not sure what language goes in the hook ("pictured"? "depicted"? "see video"? "videod"?), but we should use whatever is standard (or decide on/document a standard if none exists).
Moved to mainspace by Sdkb (talk). Self-nominated at 09:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC).
Side discussion on previous video DYKs
Not doing a complete review. How long has it been since we last had a video DYK?—Well, just over a month! I have nominated 2 articles with the video of "Daisy (advertisement)", both having made to the main page as the lead hook, with the video in 2021. See this and this. I don't know whether we have a list of video DYKs. There may be many, but the only other which I had noticed was "We choose to go to the Moon". In all the three cases, (pictured) was used. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
I missed those ones, but they look like great DYKs! "Daisy" is a really interesting commercial and I'm glad to see it as an FA! {{u|Sdkb}}talk 07:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Overall: Looks good to me! ~Gwennie🐈⦅💬📋⦆ 23:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! For the language, I liked (video shown) from here, but I'll leave it to the promoter to decide between that and (pictured). Best, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 23:41, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
@Sdkb: I'm a little concerned about image licensing here—the source isn't the most clear-cut. Can we verify that it's CC by SA 4.0? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron: Yeah, the process there was a little unusual, but happy to clarify. The video is own work by Wikipedian Dugan Murphy, who I know off-wiki. I solicited it, and when there were some technical difficulties, Dugan sent it to me and I handled the uploading. However, the edit releasing the license was made by Dugan at commons:Special:Diff/541230770, so it is CC by SA 4.0. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 05:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
I can corroborate that. I shot this video on my phone and couldn't manage to upload it myself, so I sent it to Sdkb, who uploaded it for me. I released the copyright. Dugan Murphy (talk) 13:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)