Template:Did you know nominations/Mondongo (collective)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mondongo (collective) edit
Blonde Teenie Sucking, 2004
- ... that Mondongo's Black Series ("Blonde Teenie Sucking" pictured) used cookies and crackers to recreate pornographic images from the internet?
- ALT1:... that the Black Series by Argentinian art collective Mondongo ("Blonde Teenie Sucking" pictured) used cookies and crackers to recreate pornographic images from the internet?
- Reviewed: Leptodactylus pustulatus
- Comment: I have a slight preference for leaving out "Argentinian art collective", as I think "who or what is Mondongo?" will pique readers' curiosity and lead to more readers, but have included ALT1 as an alternative. ‑ Iridescent 17:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Created by Yngvadottir (talk). Nominated by Iridescent (talk) at 17:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC).
- ALT2:... that the Argentinian art collective Mondongo, which uses unusual materials in its works, is named for a Latin American tripe stew? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough, within policy. The hook is fine and supported with inline reference, but is it too provocative to appear on the front page? Another reviewer to confirm, please. QPQ done. The image is free to use and appears in the article. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Meh; we had Fuck and Gropecunt Lane as Today's Featured Article, a pair of greased-up buttocks at both TFA and DYK, a charred human corpse as the TFA lead image, and images of three naked women eating a human corpse and a naked woman standing in the river as the DYK lead images, and the world did not come to an end. I don't think it will break the wiki to feature some suggestively arranged Custard Creams. ‑ Iridescent 15:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's quite clearly a picture of a blowjob, which is nice, but might offend some people. Hence looking for another opinion. None of your comparisons fall into x-rated territory. FunkyCanute (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Here's where we ask ourselves why Wikipedia is blocked on computers in public schools. Is this in Wikipedia's best interest to be put on its front page? Individuals are free to make dirty pictures if they like, by all means, but they seem to think this entitles them to crap in everyone's front yard, with zero consideration for children. Welcome to the world of arrested development. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.197.66.117 (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
