| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Metaphysics
- ... that metaphysics may have received its name by a historical accident?
- Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that 20th-century metaphysics started with a "revolt against idealism"? Source: [2]
- ALT2: ... that according to some metaphysicians, everything in the world is predetermined, but humans are free nonetheless? Source: [3]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lois E. Trott
- Comment:
References
- ^
- Mumford 2012, § 10. What Is Metaphysics?
- Carroll & Markosian 2010, pp. 1–2
- ^ Griffin 2013, pp. 383–385
- ^
- O’Connor & Franklin 2022, Lead Section, § 2.4 Compatibilist Accounts of Sourcehood
- Timpe, Lead Section, § 3c. Compatibilism, Incompatibilism, and Pessimism
- Armstrong 2018, p. 94
- Sources
- Mumford, Stephen (2012). Metaphysics: A Very Short Introduction (1 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-965712-4.
- Carroll, John W.; Markosian, Ned (2010). An Introduction to Metaphysics (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82629-7.
- Griffin, Nicholas (2013). "Russell and Moore's Revolt against British Idealism". In Beaney, Michael (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.013.0024. ISBN 9780191749780.
- O’Connor, Timothy; Franklin, Christopher (2022). "Free Will". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 15 May 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
- Timpe, Kevin. "Free Will". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
- Armstrong, D. M. (2018). The Mind-body Problem: An Opinionated Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-96480-0. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
Improved to Good Article status by Phlsph7 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 20 past nominations.
Phlsph7 (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
AGF on the source for ALT0, which I do not have access to. However, it is cited within the article which is good. (The sentence itself needs to be cited per DYK rules, but I did that myself to save time.) Hook itself is interesting, QPQ checks out, article eligibility and length (obviously) is good. Seems like we're good to go here. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
