Template:Did you know nominations/Market Basket protests

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 19:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Market Basket protests

edit

Created by Hirolovesswords (talk). Self nominated at 02:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC).

  • Article is new and long enough. I do not see anything interesting with the hook or the ALT. I only checked one source, as of now, and I found a lot of close paraphrasing in the article that must be addressed first. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 13:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • For example, in this ref, source says: was around the corner a suffolk superior court judge ruled that shea and darman were required to attend success story by almost any measure market basket, and on your article, a suffolk superior court judge ruled that shea and darman were required to attend. Please review again. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 14:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • - I will now make a review. This is good 2 go. hooks checks out, inline citations checks, closed paragraphs checks, refs checks, long enough, good work.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  • There are still issues with close paraphrasing here: compare for example "the fees paid to Retail Development and Management, the company owned by Arthur T.'s brothers-in-law, were not excessive given the scope of their work" with "the fees paid to Retail Development and Management — the real estate firm owned by Arthur T.’s brothers-in-law — were not excessive given the scope of its work". Nikkimaria (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
  • But when this is ready to go, obviously ALT0 ("ouster of AD by AD") has to be the hook promoted! EEng (talk) 04:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I just checked the first 15 sources for close paraphrasing and modified all the close matches I found. It wasn't terrible, but I found enough issues to warrant someone checking the remaining 30. I might check the rest myself some other time if the nomination is still open and nobody else has done it. Freikorp (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Just finished checking for and fixing issues of close paraphrasing; this article needs a new reviewer. Ping me if you need me back here. Freikorp (talk) 03:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK checklist template General eligibility:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Original hook appears in lead without cite, but nowhere else, so I struck it. Loss of $10 million in daily sales not found in article, so I struck ALT1. ALT2 is properly cited and short enough. I also pulled some random checks for paraphrasing; however, I also accept above editors' good faith in earlier dealings with this. This article is good to go with ALT2. It's a pity the original hook could not be used.Georgejdorner (talk) 02:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

ALT 1 appears in the last sentence of the Sale negotiations section. "According to one estimate, the company lost $10 million a day during the protests." Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Reference added for first hook. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
With the above corrections, all hooks are good to go. I hope this runs with the original hook.Georgejdorner (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)