Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Leopoldine of Austria
- The following is an archived discussion of Maria Leopoldine of Austria's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC).
Maria Leopoldine of Austria
edit- ... that the 17-year-old Holy Roman Empress Maria Leopoldine (pictured) died giving birth to her cousin's child?
- Reviewed: Hyperconsumerism
5x expanded by Surtsicna (talk). Self nom at 17:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Long enough, but this is nowhere near a 5x expansion in five days. Even using the raw size 4536 bytes to 7680 bytes is a 1.7x expansion. Also tagged as a stub in the WikiProject templates on the talk page, but could be reassessed as Start Class at least. --Canley (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, it's more than a 4.5× expansion. We go by prose size, not file size. (A tool such as DYKcheck is very helpful in determining this.) The prose went from 512 to 2338 characters, so 222 more would make a 5× expansion. I have only looked at the article's size, so if it's sufficiently expanded soon, someone will have to do a full review. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 11:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry for having been a bit sloppy here; the 300 characters I forgot about have been inserted as originally planned. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Surtsicna, I thought you might have left some content out! I did use DYKcheck which said it didn't qualify, but you're right Mandarax, it was close to 5x not 1.7x because I didn't DYKcheck the pre-expansion version, sorry. OK now, assuming good faith on the hook reference which is offline (and presumably in German?). --Canley (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry for having been a bit sloppy here; the 300 characters I forgot about have been inserted as originally planned. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)