Template:Did you know nominations/Little Shickshinny Creek

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 01:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Little Shickshinny Creek edit

(

)

... that more than 30 bird species live in the vicinity of Little Shickshinny Creek, including ten warbler species?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Manche Ch'ol

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 00:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC).

Looks fine, it is long enough, new enough and well sourced. But the hook disagrees with the article. The hook says 30 species of birds but the article says 33 species. Do you mean to say over 30 species not specifically 30 species of birds live in the vicinity?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Either the figure should be less specific ("more than 30....) or the wording should be "...have been recorded". But 30 (or even 33) sounds too low for any location. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- @KAVEBEAR and Pigsonthewing: I meant 33; I've changed this. --Jakob (talk) 13:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

- - My point stands. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
    - Look at page 64 of [1] if you don't believe me. --Jakob (talk) 15:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
      - I think it would be better if it was changed to [more than 30...] since the source (it is actually page 50 on the document, 64 on PDF) says "The bird diversity was exceptional for the area. Bird species documented include ...[List of 33 birds.]" Is this implying these are all of the documented ones or some of the more spectacular ones?— Preceding unsigned comment added by KAVEBEAR (talk • contribs)
        @KAVEBEAR: Without any way of knowing if that's a comprehensive list of birds, I've changed the wording in the hook to "more than 30". Perhaps it's more hooky that way anyway. --Jakob (talk) 15:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
        Ok. Good to go.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)