Template:Did you know nominations/Lifemark

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Lifemark

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Lifemark is the first Kendrick Brothers film to be based on a real life story? Source: https://www.christianpost.com/news/kendricks-film-lifemark-takes-bold-stand-for-life-post-roe.html
  • ALT1: ... that despite the commercial success of previous Kendrick Brothers films, star Kirk Cameron says Lifemark was unable to secure a distributor due to its pro-life stance? Source: https://www.dailywire.com/news/cowardice-kirk-cameron-slams-hollywood-studios-that-passed-on-lifemark-with-message-about-life
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/IBM PS/2 Model 25

Created by Jclemens (talk). Self-nominated at 04:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC).

• ALT1 is probably dead, as an editor has contested the quote to dailywire.com as insufficiently reliable for a BLP quote. The quote was picked up in a number of Christian news outlets, but unless someone really likes it better, I'm OK with running with the first hook. Jclemens (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

  ... and now Bloomberg has picked up the statement at [1], so ALT1 is alive and well again. Jclemens (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - Citations missing in the cast section. The sentence starting "A novelization by Chris Fabry..." also needs a citation.
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I note that WP:PLOTSOURCE allows for the plot section to be unreferenced. Once the other areas noted above are cited this should be good to go. CSJJ104 (talk) 00:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

CSJJ104 Sourcing added as requested, but I'll note that MOS:FILMCAST says nothing about how to cite a cast, other than that uncredited roles need citations. I've added a citation to the first actor, which covers the entire cast in the review, so hopefully that's sufficient. Jclemens (talk) 04:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Jclemons - You are correct that it is not stated that cast lists need to be cited, but neither is it stated that they can be left uncited. As this information comes under BLP I was being cautious. I am happy with the citations provided and am willing to mark this review as passed. CSJJ104 (talk) 22:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)