The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by George Ho (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Kuching edit

Improved to Good Article status by Cerevisae (talk). Nominated by Eurodyne (talk) at 22:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC).

  • This article was promoted to GA status more than 7 days ago (on 29 January). Otherwise it would be OK, it is within policy (no copyvios detected, etc.), hook is good, QPQ not needed. --Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)