Template:Did you know nominations/Kate Garvey

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Kate Garvey edit

Created by Fred Bauder (talk), Hillbillyholiday81 (talk), TCO (talk). Nominated by CallawayRox (talk) at 19:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC).

  • Aren't there more relevant hooks to use? --Conti| 21:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Agree with Conti: I think a non-Jimbo-related one would be better, perhaps something about the 'iron grip' on the diary (Blair quote). The balls one would be very "hooky" but probably a bridge too far in terms of BLP cuteness. Iron grip seems reasonable and fits the theme of the attention to detail staffer, that all the sources show.TCO (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Or maybe just something really simple like "...was Tony Blair's diary secretary". I personally hate hooks that are long, multi subject/phrase, caveated, etc. It should be "tight". This is, however, a heretical view.TCO (talk) 23:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

The article is at AfD. I'm not sure why this was nominated for DYK when the result isn't clear. SL93 (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Had to beat the 5 day deadline CallawayRox (talk) 18:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
It survived AFD. CallawayRox (talk) 17:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
ALT1 *... that Kate Garvey was Tony Blair's diary secretary?
Simpler, doesn't take any digs (or praises) at Jimbo Wales. Is, really, I think, most relevant aspect of the woman, and I like TIGHT hooks.TCO (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
ALT2 *... that Kate Garvey managed Tony Blair's diary with a "grip of iron"?
Little cuter, but not as likely to outrage as the "balls" part of the quote.TCO (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Article needs a full review now that it has survived AfD. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I reviewed this article yesterday, but I forgot to post a review. I apologize to the creators and the nominator. Anyway, the article meets all DYK criteria - long enough, new enough, reliably referenced, and no copyright issues. I assume good faith on the reference that isn't online. SL93 (talk) 05:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
      • As always, I am neutral about what hook is promoted. SL93 (talk) 05:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. The ALT1 and ALT2 hooks are suitably referenced. I prefer ALT2. (I see I have been overtaken in the race to review this article!) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
    • That's fine. We can just say you backed up my review. SL93 (talk) 05:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Your preferred hook should be used though. SL93 (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)