Template:Did you know nominations/Kamada Ekadashi

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 02:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Kamada Ekadashi edit

Krishna

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Redtigerxyz (talk) at 18:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2012 BBC Sports Personality of the Year Award
  • The article is new enough and long enough and is generally well written. I'm not familiar with the source materials and it's not clear whether the "Drik Pnachang" and "New Zealand Hare Krishna Spiritual Resource Network" web sites are reliable sources. They may be, but some clarification would help. Also, the photo is of a work of art. Can you clarify whether the work of art is within the public domain under the laws of the country where it was created? Cbl62 (talk) 07:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Have removed text dependent on "Drik Pnachang". "New Zealand Hare Krishna Spiritual Resource Network" is a ISKCON site, another ISKCON site [1] (now added as a ref for date) has a similar telling. The photo is from National Handicrafts and Handlooms Museum, New Delhi; freedom of panorama is applicable for sculptures in a public area in India. --Redtigerxyz Talk 07:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
In the past, I've seen images tagged with Freedom of Panorama references for the applicable country. Does such a tag (or link) exist for India's adoption of freedom of panorama? Cbl62 (talk) 07:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
See Commons:Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Situation_in_different_countries (applicable to any 3D work). --Redtigerxyz Talk 11:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. That seems to answer the question on the image. I'll take a final look at the other review criteria later today and let you know if there are any other issues. Cbl62 (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC);
Everything looks Ok now. Cbl62 (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)