Template:Did you know nominations/K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 09:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I edit

K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I's glyph

  • Reviewed: Not a self-nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Gen. Quon (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 19:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Good to go because this article is a GA. HYH.124 (talk) 04:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • @HYH.124: this article is now a DYK nomination, so it needs to be reviewed according to DYK criteria. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYK Reviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Date correct, QPQ not required (not self-nomination), article contains mostly offline sources. Image used for hook is freely licensed. Hook is sourced in the article. Need somebody to check the article to ensure it is within policy. (This is not a requirement but the hook could sound more interesting) HYH.124 (talk) 05:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • @HYH.124: thanks for starting the review. What do you mean by "Need somebody to check the article to ensure it is within policy"? If the review isn't finished, you should use a question-mark tick rather than an approval tick. Yoninah (talk) 10:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Maybe you could be more specific, if there are any issues that need to be clarified? Oceanh (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Are you talking to me, @Oceanh:? I just came by to promote the article and couldn't understand the review. Yoninah (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • No, it was actually a response to a (templated) message on my talk page, saying that there are some issues with this nomination that may need to be clarified. And it appeared somewhat unclear to me what I could help with. Oceanh (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
I changed the review symbol. I have not completed the review yet, and I notified Oceanh for him/her to watch this nomination, not for any specific issues to be clarified. Sorry for the trouble, I am not familiar with reviewing process. HYH.124 (talk) 04:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Article is well written and cited with reliable sources. Hook is sourced in the article. Good to go. HYH.124 (talk) 09:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)