Template:Did you know nominations/Iota Sigma Pi

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:44, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Iota Sigma Pi edit

5x expanded by Staceydolxx (talk). Nominated by Worm That Turned (talk) at 08:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC).

  • x10 expanded, adequately sourced, QPQ done. Hook sounds good and is verified by an inline citation. However, when I carried out a copy-vio check, phrases like "that promotes professional development and personal growth of women in chemistry and related fields", "that promotes professional development and personal growth of women in chemistry and related fields", "through recognition public outreach and the formation of supportive networks", "stimulate personal accomplishment in chemical fields" are an exact copy-paste from the source document. Vensatry (ping) 17:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your feedback. I didn't alter the lead of the article (just added refs) and I didn't realise it was a direct copy - I will change it. The last quote is in quotation marks as it is directly from the source (I didn't know how else to write it). ツStacey (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Per Vensatry. The problematic material which existed before the expansion has been removed, and part of one source is quoted and cited correctly. GTG. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)