Template:Did you know nominations/In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 20:54, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data edit
- ... that according to the 2013 ruling of the court case In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, the government can access cell site records without a warrant?
Created by Morninj (talk). Nominated by Mjav.eva (talk) at 16:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC).
Created 4 March, nominated 11 March. This is outside the 5 day threshold and is ineligible. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 15:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Since this is a first DYK by a new nominator, should this be given an exception to the five-day rule, given it was nominated only two days late, or should it be rejected? I think there may be issues with WP:PRIMARY, since there appear to be only three secondary sources, each used once, and the court case (and related cases, all primary sources) are used for the remaining several dozen inline citations. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Fairly long article, and the nomination was only two days late. Considering this is the user's first time, I think age is fine. Rereview needed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
