Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Il Lee's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by Redtigerxyz Talk 15:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC).

Il Lee edit

  • Reviewed: Lord Flea
  • Comment: This nom is a shot in the dark but I'd been sitting on this expansion and just thought I'd complete it and submit it. I'm aware it probably doesn't meet normal expansion limits, BUT: along with my additions it IS a FULL REWRITE... does that make it eligible? A quick comparison of the edit history from prior to my revision will clearly show just about ALL prose except for "notable exhibitions" is NEW (on top of this current over-2x expansion). I'd contributed to the article when it was still a "stub." If it doen't meet requirements, so be it; least I tried.

Created/expanded by Penwatchdog (talk). Self nominated at 07:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC).

Does that mean I did in fact meet the 5x requirement? Have yet to learn that function. Thanks Crisco. Meanwhile tweaking the article as i can Penwatchdog (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
PLEASE REMOVE THIS DYK NOM by request of author and nominator: Penwatchdog (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)