Template:Did you know nominations/Iatrochemistry

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by SL93 (talk) 03:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Per BlueMoonset's rationale below.

Iatrochemistry

edit

Created/expanded by Dhk0308 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC).

Started as 5,478 characters, now at 14,751 characters, it's far short of the 27,390 it needs to be a 5x expansion. Also, references are missing in the first few paragraphs of "History in Europe" and the entire section "Challenge to Galenic physiology". Earwig finds no copyvios, FWIW.
It's a cool topic and I'd love to see it on the Main Page, but you'd need to double the current size for it to be eligible for DYK as an expansion. However, it's on its way to what you need for Good Article status. If you can attain Good Article status, you can then nominate it again at DYK as a recent Good Article, and it would be likely to pass then. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 04:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Article has not been expanded at all in the past three weeks, so I think it's clear that it will not qualify as a 5x expansion. On the other hand, the article has been nominated at WP:GAN, so there is a chance that it might become eligible later this spring or summer; if that occurs, then a new DYK nomination can be submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)