- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
HPgV-2 edit
Created by Ruslik0 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC).
Article is new; long enough (1911 characters / 311 words "readable prose size");. The sentence in the article with the hook fact has a citation, but it is not freely available online. A quick Google search found other sources with the fact: (from an abstract: "We present the discovery of a second pegivirus, provisionally designated human pegivirus 2 (HPgV-2), by next-generation sequencing of plasma from an HCV-infected patient with multiple bloodborne exposures who died from sepsis of unknown etiology.") QPQ done. Hook is interesting. Only the abstract of source 1 is available online, so I have to assume good faith that there is no close paraphrasing/copyvios. Dup Detector on sources 2,3, & 5 (compared to full text of the articles, not just the link in the article) doesn't show any inappropriate paraphrasing. Notes: I bolded the DYK article in the hook and removed the stub tag in the article per supplementary rule D11 ("If there is a stub tag, it should normally be removed if the article is long enough for DYK."). AHeneen (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
