Template:Did you know nominations/Gudjonsson suggestibility scale

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Gudjonsson suggestibility scale edit

(

)

... that the Gudjonsson suggestibility scale has been used in court cases to determine how suggestible a person will be during interrogation? Source: "Oregon vs. Romero & New Jersey vs. King" "State v. Romero""State of New Jersey v. George King , Jr."

5x expanded by CSD96 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC).

Happy with hook. Article has met requirement for 5x expansion, is long enough, well sourced and free of copyright violations as per Earwig's. Article does not have an image and requires no QPQ as nominator has 0 DYK credits. However, the lede of the article should be expanded before nomination is passed. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Lead length has never been part of DYK requirements. If that is the only problem the article should be promoted. If we want DYK nominations to be up to GA standard then we should make it a rule that nominations have first been through the GA process. SpinningSpark 17:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)