Template:Did you know nominations/Green Park tube station
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Green Park tube station edit
- ... that the Queen and Prince Charles travelled on London Underground trains from Green Park tube station when they carried out the official openings of the Victoria and Jubilee lines? Source: Refs 33 and 42.
- ALT1:... that to help cool the London Underground's Green Park tube station groundwater is extracted from boreholes sunk 130 metres (430 ft) into the chalk aquifer under London? Source: Ref 57.
- ALT2:... that when a new entrance for the London Underground's Green Park tube station was created, the Diana Fountain was moved from its original location in the centre of Green Park? Source: Ref 55.
- Reviewed: Überwasserkirche
Improved to Good Article status by DavidCane (talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC). Currently going through Featured Article Candidate Process.
Article was promoted to good article status on 27 August. It is long enough, neutral, uses inline citations and I cannot see any copyright violations. The first hook is 75 characters too long, and ALT2 is 28 characters too long. If you want to tweak them, please feel free, but I actually prefer ALT1. I think it's the most interesting. All three hooks are sourced using inline citations. ALT1 uses an offline source. QPQ has been done. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank for reviewing June. As the plain text of original hook and ALT 2 are both under 200 characters (181 and 176 characters respectively), I assume you did the character count on the hooks using the wikitext rather than the plain text. I think that it is the plain text that the hook length is calculated on. For example, the plain text for the DYK that ran earlier today for Überwasserkirche, the nomination I reviewed, is 192 characters, but the wikitext is 214. The DYK currently on the main page about the killing of Mollie Tibbits is 175 in the plain text, but 220 characters in the wikitext. Perhaps one of the DYK managers can confirm.DavidCane (talk) 17:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, if that's the case, then I'm happy to go with the first hook. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank for reviewing June. As the plain text of original hook and ALT 2 are both under 200 characters (181 and 176 characters respectively), I assume you did the character count on the hooks using the wikitext rather than the plain text. I think that it is the plain text that the hook length is calculated on. For example, the plain text for the DYK that ran earlier today for Überwasserkirche, the nomination I reviewed, is 192 characters, but the wikitext is 214. The DYK currently on the main page about the killing of Mollie Tibbits is 175 in the plain text, but 220 characters in the wikitext. Perhaps one of the DYK managers can confirm.DavidCane (talk) 17:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
