Template:Did you know nominations/Good Christians All, Rejoice and Sing
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Good Christians All, Rejoice and Sing edit
... that Good Christians All, Rejoice and Sing is focused on the Resurrection of Jesus?
- Reviewed: Palestinian wine
- Comment: For 27 March (Easter Sunday)
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 10:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC).
Article is long enough, new enough, has sufficient in-line citations. AGF on offline sources, its free of copyvio issues. I don't see any neutrality issues. My only concern is that this hook is not very interesting. A lot of hymns are about the resurrection of Jesus; if you could make a hook incorporating some part of the hymn's unique history, that would be more interesting. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 05:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Ashorocetus: ALT1 ... that the Easter hymn "Good Christians All, Rejoice and Sing" was renamed to avoid confusion with the Christmas carol "Good Christians All, Rejoice"? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:02, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Perfect. ALT1 is good to go. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 15:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Pulled from prep because a recent deletion from the article has reduced it to 1490 prose characters, too short for DYK. The C of E, I recommend at least another full sentence be added, since it is so short. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: I have added a new sentence. Can you please re-add the green tick and put it back into the preps please? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
