- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 17:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
GL Mk. I radar edit
- ... that all of the chicken wire in England disappeared as the British Army installed its first radar system, the Gun Laying Mark I (Mk. II pictured)?
- Reviewed: Lots and lots and lots and lots. Let's say Wolfhouse Run.
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self nominated at 13:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC).
- Perhaps a UK-US thing, but I'd suggest "its first", not "their first". EEng (talk) 01:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Done.
New enough. Long enough; substantially researched and well written article. (I've made minor copy-edits.) Neutral tone. Citations throughout. Most of the sources are offline. AGF there. A great new addition to the Wikipedia. GTG. Hybernator (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the British Army's first radar system, the Gun Laying Mark I (Mk. II pictured), made all the chicken wire in England disappear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EEng (talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Semantically, I don't think those hooks work. I find it highly dubious that everything anywhere would miraculously disappear unless a) you're a magician or b) there was some systematic effort at gathering the item to ensure that none was squirrelled away. I don't have access to the original source but this reference refers to supplies being depleted, which is slightly different. How about:- ALT2: ... that the British Army's first radar system, the Gun Laying radar (Mk. II pictured), used up the nation's entire stockpile of chicken wire? Fuebaey (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oh for heaven's sake, use your common sense. It's OK for a hook to be slightly hyperbolic, especially where the reader will understand that (a) no magic is involved and (b) likely "all ... disappeared" is meant to be attention-grabbing. Our readers are not moronic children who will stupidly interpret everything literally. The original hook and ALT1 are both fine. ALT2 is fine as well, if you don't mind stodginess. EEng (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm perfectly happy with ALT2 if that gets this done. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe if we grill someone on the witness stand. EEng (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
By all means, feel free to disagree. In either case, someone else needs to recheck those hooks. Fuebaey (talk) 14:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- - I am just reviewing the hook as Hybernator has done the rest. As the nominator (Maury Markowitz) is happy with Alt2 I think we should go with that one. ツStacey (talk) 13:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
