Template:Did you know nominations/Fourpence (British coin)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Fourpence (British coin)

edit

Created by Retroplum (talk). Self nominated at 16:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC).

  • Long enough; new enough; within policy; interesting, well cited, and succinct hook (especially if like me you are of British origin :-) ). Image seems to be free why not add it? Minor point: There's something weird about cite2 (Leland). Google Books seems to have scanned volume 2 instead of the claimed volume 1. I found a scan of volume one here but the joey info appears on page 114 not 121. (Oddly, Leland places the info under the entry for "bit" not "joey." so it's a "bit" hard to find ;-) ). Maybe different editions have different paginations? I AGF that no QPQ is needed. Cheers! Woz2 (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I had a look and found the same reference (I think it's yet another version of the same book) and switched it for the old one, so it now links to a Google Books book which is viewable. The page numbers should make sense at least now. As for the image, it could be used but I recently submitted another DYK that had a coin image and don't want it to get too "coin heavy" :P. Also, the images aren't as crisp as they could be and I'm going to try and get better ones when I can. Thanks. Retroplum (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)