Template:Did you know nominations/First Nations in Alberta

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

First Nations in Alberta edit

(

)

... that the newest First Nation in Alberta, the Peerless Trout First Nation, was created in 2010?

ALT1:... that in 2011 there were 19,945 non-Status Indians living in Alberta?
ALT2:... that there are 48 functioning First Nations in Alberta, but only 45 by law?
Reviewed: Grey triggerfish
Comment: Was purely a list, added the prose section.

5x expanded by Kevlar67 (talk). Self nominated at 16:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC).

The following has been checked in this review by Maile
QPQ done by Kevlar67
DYK Check confirms 5X expansion that began on Feb 24, 2014
10033 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
Duplication Detector check of online sourcing found no copyvio
First hook stated in the article and sourced
ALT1 hook stated in the article and sourced
ALT2 hook stated in the article, but the sourcing does not seem to specify the number "48"
Every paragraph needs to have at least one inline source
Dab links need to be taken care of
External links tool shows 3 dead links

This is a nicely detailed article on the First Nations in Alberta. Just needs a few little fixes.— Maile (talk) 15:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Comment: Kevlar67 has just posted to my talk page that a little more time is needed (new baby!) to address the issues here. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Update: Removed dead links, added more detailed refs with quotations for ALT 3, removed uncited section completely, fixed DAB links. Should be good now. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 23:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

New reviewer needed to complete review. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Still paragraphs starting Anthropologists and Bands have no citation. I fixed on DAB link myself too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
  - Also, ref 9 is a bare URL, which is not allowed for DYK articles; it needs to be filled in. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Update - Citations added for problem paras, bare ref converted to a template. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 20:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Reiterating call for new reviewer to complete review now that citations have been added. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Based on Maile66's review and checking the repairs, I can see all is referenced now, no bare links. Numbers are confirmed in a table at http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-011-x/2011001/tbl/tbl03-eng.cfm. Primary hooks had two links back to this same page, so I am going to say Good to Go with alt1. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)