- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
EMD F40PH edit
- ... that the EMD F40PH (pictured) diesel locomotive appears on the Canadian ten-dollar note? Source: More plastic for your wallet: A look at Canada's new polymer bills
- ALT1:... that in Canada, ten dollars will get you an EMD F40PH (pictured) diesel locomotive?
- Reviewed: François Bott
- Comment: I'd like to hold this for April 9, when the model entered service.
Improved to Good Article status by Mackensen (talk). Self-nominated at 02:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC).
Maybe I am missing something here, but it looks like this DYK? nomination simply doesn't meet the necessary criteria for this; after all, it was neither created nor expanded five-fold within seven days of this DYK? nomination being made. Indeed, can someone here please double-check this? Futurist110 (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Futurist110: it was promoted to good article status within the past seven days. Mackensen (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry; I didn't see that. :( Futurist110 (talk) 01:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Futurist110: it was promoted to good article status within the past seven days. Mackensen (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
I love the ATL1 suggestion. It would be a good joke on April Fool's Day. FunksBrother (talk) 18:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that would have been great had this DYK? nomination actually qualified. Futurist110 (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:DYK "Articles designated as Good articles within the past seven days, regardless of whether they were expanded, are also eligible." This article achieved GA status March 8, 2017. Futurist110 If you wish to use this as a QPQ credit, please provide a review that covers the DYK criteria. For your convenience, at the top of this template in the DYK Toolbox is a Reviewer's template that lists each of the criteria required for a review. Thank you for your participation. — Maile (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Length, Date, Cite, QPQ, and Earwigs check. Image is freely licensed and logged in OTRS. Both hooks approved. Mifter Public (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)