- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Dearborn Homes edit
- ... that the Chicago Housing Authority' renovation of the Dearborn Homes housing project includes adding neo-Georgian quoins and ball-topped gables to the brick high-rises?
Created/expanded by XHolmes (talk), Yngvadottir (talk). Nominated by Yngvadottir (talk) at 17:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I've now reviewed Patterns of Conflict. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Date and length (just) are OK. Article is referenced and has appropriate tone. Slight problem in that I can't find the word "pediments" in the key citation from the Chicago Tribune. I suppose you could take that section out of the hook. NB this is my first review so I'm sorry if I've missed anything. Tigerboy1966 13:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing it! Well spotted. He actually calls them gables. The passage is:
and it is here in the Google Books version. That version also has a pic. So shall I say gables or stick with pediments? (Also I owe a quid pro quo review for this nomination. I'll note here when I've done it.) Yngvadottir (talk) 15:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)So he gave the previously flat-roofed buildings triangle-shaped, limestone gables, topped by balls that etch a profile against the sky. Brick was removed from the corners and replaced with corner details called quoins.
- I would change the hook and the corresponding sentence in the article. I would then be happy to "pass" it (if that's the right term). Tigerboy1966 15:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, changed in both places (and I checked that Gable is not a DAB page). I will do a quid pro quo as soon as I can . . . thanks in advance for the check mark/tick :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- I would change the hook and the corresponding sentence in the article. I would then be happy to "pass" it (if that's the right term). Tigerboy1966 15:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing it! Well spotted. He actually calls them gables. The passage is:
issue quickly resolved, thanks. Tigerboy1966 16:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)