Template:Did you know nominations/Cubbington Pear Tree

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Flibirigit (talk) 00:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Cubbington Pear Tree

edit
The Cubbington Pear Tree
The Cubbington Pear Tree

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 08:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC).

  • Hi -WBG, just a reminder that this one is still open. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello WBG? - Dumelow (talk) 23:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Doing the review within hours (next edit will be here-)); I forgot this in entirety and weirdly, did not receive your earlier ping. Apologies, WBGconverse 17:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
It's an obvious checkY from me, as to the article. But, how about a hook that explicitly mentions about the (Tree of the Year)/(Oldest wild-pear tree in GB) being subject to a felling attempt? Won't it be more hooky? WBGconverse 16:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the review WBG. With regards your suggestion: doesn't the first hook say this? Happy to amend it if you have any improvement? Note that it is not definitively the oldest wild pear -the source only says "it may be the UK's oldest wild pear tree" - Dumelow (talk) 17:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Many apologies and that's just what I sought. On a note, I will be opening a VPP thread; whilst I come across the code of the first hook, (in the edit-window) and it's perfectly previewable; it's not displayed in the page:( WBGconverse 17:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • --Primary hook is approved.WBGconverse 17:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)