Template:Did you know nominations/Cross of Sorrow

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by ~ RobTalk 15:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Cross of Sorrow

edit
Cross of Sorrow
Cross of Sorrow

Created by Altenmann (talk). Self-nominated at 04:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC).

Interesting, AGF for the mostly Russian sources, I added the image, and tweaked a bit to include "of both sides", because I think it's good to know that, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Needs a full review. The basic DYK criteria (as they appear on the preview screen) should be mentioned in the review. ~ RobTalk 09:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
This is my 104th review this year, I know what to check and don't write it down every time. Compare the others, - most were not as easy as this one. If it pleases you I can state that this article is new enough, of sufficient length, nominated in time, and I found no apparent copyvio to the sources I can and AGF for the others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Needs an in-line citation no later than the end of the sentence where the author is named (Lankinen), since that's included in the hook, as per DYK criteria. Ping me when that's added and I'll restore the tick. ~ RobTalk 12:05, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Ping --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. @Gerda Arendt: Sorry about my wording of that last comment; I didn't mean that you or anyone else couldn't add a tick, just that I'd be happy to do it if pinged in the interests of hurrying this along. It was a poor choice of wording. ~ RobTalk 13:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)