Template:Did you know nominations/Cleveland Centennial half dollar

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Cleveland Centennial half dollar edit

Reverse
Reverse

Created by Wehwalt (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 15:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Either's fine with me.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Sophisticated article, all DYK criteria met. Sorry, I don't like the hooks too much, but perhaps you can convince me. First is boring (at least to me), unless we want to promote Cincinatti. Second is slightly too funny (at least for me). How about only one year to make it easier for collectors (and then not selling). Other suggestions welcome, unless you think the nice properly licensed image will be attractive enough, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • I'd much rather focus on the oddity of having someone from a completely different city promote the Cleveland dollar. This has been previously commented upon ("Editor Lee Hewitt commented in the Numismatic Scrapbook, 'it seems strange that Mr. Melish, living in Cincinnati, should be the distributor of the Cleveland issue.'"). What is funny about ALT2? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • The "oddity" of it didn't strike me at all, but if you don't mind that readers unfamiliar with relations of US cities may miss it, fine,
, offline sources accepted AGF, I prefer ALT1 though as closer to the picture, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)