Template:Did you know nominations/Chamber pop

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Miyagawa (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Chamber pop

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Ilovetopaint (talk). Self-nominated at 17:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC).

  • Great work and interesting read ;) Length, date of nom, sourcing, including for hook, and QPQ are all good. I'll do a copyright check tomorrow as I only have mobile access at the moment. Unless any copyvio is detected, this nomination should be good to go. --Al Ameer (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  • A copyvio was indeed found, Al Ameer, but not until after it was promoted to prep. In future, please do not give a tick to any article when you have not yet completed the review. Ilovetopaint, I see that you have embarked on an extensive series of edits since Black Kite tagged the article for plagiarism. Please let us know when you have completed these updates, and we will then get a new reviewer. I will probably also request that Nikkimaria check the article for copyvio/plagiarism/close paraphrasing before calling the new reviewer, so it can be given an all clear. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  • @BlueMoonset: I'm not sure how much the article needed to be rephrased but I think things should be okay now. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 05:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Our lead is pretty much the same as the AllMusic article. There's also significant close paraphrasing of other sources, including Treblezine and Billboard. I've tagged the article and will shortly be posting a GAR. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)