- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Brut Chronicle edit
- ... Did you know that in medieval England, the Brut Chronicle was one of the most-copied chronicles of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries?[1]
- Created by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) and Drmies (Talk). Nominated by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) at 07:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC).
New enough (transcluded late/wrong date, but nom was made day of, and all the content was there.) Long enough. No copyvio or close plagiarism detected. Neutral and cited. QPQ done and the hook is interesting and short enough. Good to go.@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi and Drmies: really enjoyed reading this. A nice break from 17th century conclaves :) If you wouldn't mind a quick stylistic comment: the article seemed a slightly heavy on parenthetical comments that threw me off a bit as a reader. Not a huge issue, but the one thing that stood out to me. Anyway, great work and thanks for the interesting read. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks TonyBallioni :) I blame Drmies for those bits, of course ;) Cheers! — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 15:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
