Template:Did you know nominations/Broad Front UNEN
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Broad Front UNEN edit
- ... that most non-Peronist political parties in Argentina have united in the political coalition Broad Front UNEN?
- Reviewed: Nairn Transport Company
Created by Cambalachero (talk). Self nominated at 23:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. However, I am unclear as to the suitability of this article for Wikipedia, per WP:NOTNEWS. Checking on some other entries under Category:Coalitions of parties in Argentina, I just see stubs. The subject of this article simply seems too new to satisfy WP:EVENT. In terms of content, it doesn't explain what the Republican Proposal controversy is all about, and the list of sources is rather scanty. Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I have added some more content and references. Yes, the coalition is new, but it is notable: the big politics of Argentina are involved in it, and it is among the likely major parties of the 2015 presidential elections. As for Macri, the issue is as described: from the point of view of logistics and strategy, it would be advisable for UNEN to join forces with Macri, but from the point of view of political perspectives, the coalition is centre-left and Macri is centre-right and should not mix. Some give priority to the first thing and support an agreement, and others to the second and reject it. Cambalachero (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, that's much better. In my earlier comment, I wasn't aware that the Republican Proposal was a party; I thought it was a proposal. Everything checks out and the hook ref is verified and cited inline. I tweaked the hook to indicate it's something happening now. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
