Template:Did you know nominations/Braemar Hill Mansions

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 06:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Braemar Hill Mansions edit

Braemar Hill Mansions in Hong Kong
Braemar Hill Mansions in Hong Kong

Created by SSTflyer (talk). Self-nominated at 10:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is long enough (1943 characters (339 words) "readable prose size") and created on 22 December (Article created by SSTflyer on December 22, 2015), although the tool claims that it lacks inline citations (No inline citations), it actually does have citations, online references in Chinese, I have to assume good faith, all images are under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, I have to assume that the article does not contain plagiarism or close paraphrasing. QPQ was done. Hook is interesting, cited and verified. Looks okay to go MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Per Rule D2, the article must have inline citations, which this article lacks. Please replace the parenthetical citation style with inline cites. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Parenthetical references are an acceptable type of inline citations. sst✈discuss 04:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  • I already stated that it has inline citations! MisterBee1966 (talk) 05:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  • The article has no inline citations. In addition to Rule D2, hook content must be sourced in the article with an inline citation to a reliable source at the end of the sentence that contains hook content, as per WP:WIADYK #3b. The article needs work for this nomination to move forward. North America1000 08:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
  • This should be good to go per the above review. The parenthetical references in the article are functional, which is something I missed when I commented above. ( Facepalm) North America1000 11:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)