Template:Did you know nominations/Big Run (East Branch Fishing Creek)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Big Run (East Branch Fishing Creek) edit

  • ... that the minimum pH of Big Run is less than 3?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 00:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC).

  • Date, length and QPQ all fine. Citations are used but it would be nice to have specific page numbers as the referenced document is so long and despite scanning through the 83 pages I can't find support for the hook fact - Basement12 (T.C) 16:58, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  • @Basement12: It's supported by the chart on the top of page 26. For future reference, using cntrl+F is often helpful for verifying hooks in long sources. --Jakob (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  • @Jakec: I'm well aware of Ctrl+F but in this case it was no use - hard to make it search for a line on a chart. I'd still like to see page numbers for the citations (see Help:References and page numbers) but I guess the article meets the basic requirements for DYK without them - Basement12 (T.C) 17:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)