Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Sambisa Forest (2021)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Sambisa Forest (2021)

Created by Applodion (talk). Self-nominated at 11:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: ALT#3 looks good, thanks. Aussie Article Writer (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

    • I provide some ALTs; please tell me which one you prefer or if you want something else entirely:
ALT1: ... that Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau reportedly exploded himself to kill an Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant commander during the Battle of Sambisa Forest (2021)? (Source: How Did Abubakar Shekau Die? Here's What We Know So Far.)
ALT2: ... that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant possibly wanted to catch Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau alive during Battle of Sambisa Forest (2021), only for him to reportedly commit suicide? (Source: What Shekau's Death Means For Security In Nigeria, Lake Chad)
ALT3: ... that many Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant fighters were able to reunite with their kidnapped families after the Battle of Sambisa Forest (2021)? (Source: What Shekau's Death Means For Security In Nigeria, Lake Chad)
ALT4: ... that Abubakar Shekau, who was "too extreme even by the Islamic State's standards", was probably killed in the Battle of Sambisa Forest (2021) with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant? (Source: The Defeat of Abu Bakr Shekau's Group in Sambisa Forest)
Applodion (talk) 08:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
I can work with ALT#3. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Applodion is this information in the actual article? - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@Aussie Article Writer: See "ISWAP also captured large amounts of weaponry at Shekau's camp, while many ISWAP fighters were able to reunite with their families who had been seized by Shekau and held at the Sambisa Forest camps after the rebel splintering." Applodion (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@Applodion: this looks good, accepting ALT#3 - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
I was going to promote this hook, but I do not think ALT3 is supported by the text or verified by the source. As far as I can determine from the article, ISWAP was created when Boko Haram and ISIL merged. Both the source and the article mention that ISWAP troops reunited with their families, but it cannot be verified that these people considered themselves part of ISIL at the time nor were originally part of ISIL. Pinging @Applodion and Aussie Article Writer: for further thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 01:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Z1720 I had checked the source for this, and it seemed reliable but perhaps there is an issue I was unaware of. Applodion, could you clarify? - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
My concern is not with the reliability of the source, but with saying, "many Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant fighters". I think the hook should say, "many Islamic State's West Africa Province's fighters." Also, I have just noticed that the wikilink to Islamic State's West Africa Province in the lede points to ISIL, while the wikilink in the article's text points to Boko Harem, so I am not sure which one we are supposed to use. Z1720 (talk) 02:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
@Z1720: The problem here is related to the fact that ISWAP has no separate article. One was supposed to be created years ago, but nobody got to it. Boko Haram and ISIL actually never really "merged"; Boko Haram intially pleged allegiance to ISIL - officially becoming "ISWAP" and part of ISIL -, but then got engulfed in a civil war. As a result of this conflict the "original" Boko Haram/ISWAP split into Skekau's faction (usually called "Boko Haram" because it remained largely the same) and the pro-ISIL group (which called itself "ISWAP") which has fully integrated into ISIL. As the battle article points out, ISWAP even includes troops from and is directed by core-ISIL, meaning that any ISWAP fighters are - by extension - ISIL fighters (btw, this is reflected in US terror designations as well). The linkage of the hook was supposed to reflect this, as it would be wrong to link ISWAP and get redirected to Boko Haram.
If this would solve the issue, I would be willing to create a small start-level article on ISWAP to finally differentiate it from Boko Haram. Applodion (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)