Template:Did you know nominations/Arriagadoolithus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 06:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Arriagadoolithus edit

Created by Ashorocetus (talk). Self-nominated at 01:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC).

  • Article new enough and long enough. Article and hook are cited. Should the article note that the brooding was not thought likely in Agnolin 2012? Also the hook is rather wordy and could be trimmed a little to be more concise.--Kevmin § 21:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Fixed the article on that point. Here's an attempt at a more concise hook: Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 23:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

* ALT1: ... that fossilized fungi were found on an Arriagadoolithus shell, the eggs of the alvarezsaurid dinosaur Bonapartenykus?

  • This flows a little better to my reading. Im not sure the alvarezsaurid dinosaur descriptors are needed for Bonapartenykus. That information is in both Arriagadoolithus and Bonapartenykus after all.--Kevmin § 23:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • OK. I think the descriptor "dinosaur" should be included so people have some context for what they're looking at. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 17:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT1b: ... that fossilized fungi were found on an Arriagadoolithus shell, the egg of the dinosaur Bonapartenykus?
  • Time to get this show on the road. Minor edit made, source read over again. Thanks to Kevmin for earlier review. ALT1b is good to go. Drmies (talk) 01:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)