The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Apus

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 02:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC).

  • GA status verified. Article meets DYK requirements for length, quality, and sourcing. Earwig found no significant copyvio (as you would expect from GA but you never know; there are some phrases in common but they are mostly technical terms that are hard to phrase any other way). The first hook is boring but I like ALT1 and checked its sourcing. QPQ done. Good to go with ALT1. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)