Template:Did you know nominations/Amanda Weltman

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Amanda Weltman

edit

Created by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC).

The article is new enough (moved from user space) and long enough. Well referenced and neutral (removed the bit about her being "well known" in favour of "known"). Also struck known from one of the hooks and South African from the first for brevity. No pic to review. I have taken the liberty of adding Justin Khoury into the first hook in order that I may approve it as it needs to make clear she was the co-author of the paper. I don't like the Alts either. Hook is correctly formatted. I detected no copyvios or close paraphrasing apart from scientific phrases and the awards section where it would be expected. AGF on the interpretation of the scientific content. It's good to go with the first hook. I am open to a better wording of the hook if anyone sees one. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Philafrenzy; I'm okay with the addition; you're right that it's important. I would rephrase it as follows, however: do take a look. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)