Template:Did you know nominations/Abrothrix illuteus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Abrothrix illuteus, Podocarpus parlatore edit

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC).

  • Abrothrix illuteus: Article 5x expanded on 2 October; article (just) exceeds minimum length; article is well written on the whole but I have a couple of queries: I think "unguinal" should be "inguinal"? some of the technical terms might be worth wikilinking also (doral, ventral, inguinal etc.) if a suitable article is available; article is cited inline to reliable sources throughout; no copyright violation or overly close paraphrasing noted
  • Podocarpus parlatorei Article 5x expanded on 3 October; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written, again some words might benefit from wikilinking if an article is available (globose, falcate, montane); no copyright violation or overly close paraphrasing noted
  • Hook fact is cited inline in both articles and checks out to a reliable source, though i couldn't view the IUCN page for some reason I am happy to presume that it verifies the "eastern flanks" part of the hook. QPQs have been done - Dumelow (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I have done some wikilinking. The IUCN seem to be revamping their website. I foresee thousands of articles acquiring dead links! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)