Template:Did you know nominations/2011 M5 motorway crash

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

2011 M5 motorway crash

edit

M5 motorway southbound to the accident site.

Created/expanded by Gjlewis1974 (talk). Nominated by Donnie Park (talk) at 18:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk)


Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk)


Comment The hook is not supported by the sources. All that we have is a "line of inquiry", and there was a fog at the time. Weasel words required here. Do not want to single out some living people who may not have done anything wrong. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


Hook review for ALT1
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk) Hawkeye7 (talk)


Comment The ALT hook is not mentioned or cited in the text. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

  • How about...

Alt 2 that a recent multiple-vehicle collision involving 34 vehicles near Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom resulted in 7 deaths and 51 injuries?

    • Yes, that is good to go. (I double-checked that none of the 51 have since died of their injuries.) Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Gjlewis1974 (talk), Skinsmoke (talk · contribs), Bob Re-born (talk · contribs), Polyamorph (talk · contribs), Pontificalibus (talk · contribs), BridesheadRecarpeted (talk · contribs), Gjlewis1974 (talk · contribs), Rodw (talk · contribs), Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs), Ianmacm (talk · contribs), WWGB (talk · contribs), Bridgeplayer (talk · contribs). Nom by Simply south (talk · contribs) and Donnie Park (talk · contribs). Simply south...... "time, department skies" for 5 years 17:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

  • I was just considering nominating this. How about ALT3: ... that the use of fireworks has been investigated as a possible cause of the recent 34 vehicle pile-up on the M5 motorway (accident site pictured) in Taunton, Somerset? Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • I've also added credits for the authors whom I think contributed the most (i.e. not just copyediting) Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
    • I would prefer "as a possible cause" pending the result of the inquest. (Which has already started. They don't muck about over there.) Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Which is preferred, ALT2 or 3? Or both? Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
    • ALT3 sounds more interesting; ALT2 is more of a restatement of the news. And ALT3 carry contain the picture. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)