Talk:You Are in Love/GA1

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Pollosito in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section):   b (inline citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Hey, @Brachy08! I will be reviewing this article in a few days. What worries me about this process is the shortness of the article, but I will try to save it, I think it is worth it. Best, Santi (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing this article Brachy08 (Talk) 00:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Background and writing

edit
  • Can you put an additional source to verify the Red's release date?
  • Replace parameter "p" with "pp" in ref 2, 'cause it doesn't work.
  • It's page 78, not 77. See Clean (song), which has the same info.
  • For "after her birth year", use this. Refs 5 and 6 don't mention that.
  • Verify that at that time she was on the Red Tour. I know you put it the way it is out of logic, but maybe don't do that.
  • Ref 7 needs to be archieved.
  • Link American Songwriter in ref 9. Furthermore, change template to "cite magazine" and archive it.
  • Authorship and archiving missing in ref 8.

Lyrics and composition

edit
  • Authorship for ref 13, 15, 16 and 18.
  • Archiving for ref 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18.
  • Change template to "cite magazine" for ref 11, 13, 15 and 18.
  • Change template to "cite news" to ref 12.
  • Delete authorship for ref 11 and change "Clash Magazine Music News, Reviews & Interviews" to "[[Clash (magazine)|Clash]]"
  • Just leave "David Greenwald" in authorship, delete the rest. Replace "oregonlive" to "[[The Oregonian]]
  • Link the websites/magazines/news in all the sources.
  • Fuse ref 15 and 17, they are the same.
  • "Swift also said that she wrote it as a commentary of Swift and Dunham's relationship." Wasn't it Antonoff?.
      Done (by the reviewer)
  • "Swift says she finds it difficult and boring at times. The song also describes love and something that can be felt, seen or heard." I don't understand it.
  • "When interviewed about writing "You Are in Love", Swift said she found it difficult and boring at times." Is that "it" the relationship or the songwriting? According to ref 15, that's the first.
  • "The song also describes love and something that can be felt, seen or heard." I'll assume it's inspired by this part of ref 15: The song’s brief verses documenting everyday life (“Morning, his place / Burnt toast, Sunday”) remind listeners that love doesn’t have to be a grand, sweeping fairytale to be special. If so, I think it would be better to say => "The song also describes that love does not have to be something perfect."

Release and commercial performance

edit
  • It would be better if "iTunes" was always with a lowercase i. I say this because this is not fulfilled in ref 18.
  • Could you tell me the exact quote where it can be confirmed that Swift played it on a steel guitar? I assume it's in the Washington Post article, but I can't access it.
  • Authorship and archiving for the sources that need it.

Critical reception

edit
  • Archiving totally missing.

Credits and personnel

edit
  • It would be better to source the credits, as happens in "Clean".

Charts

edit
  • Passed.

Certification

edit
  • Passed.

Comments

edit