Talk:Yang 3 in 2D

Latest comment: 12 years ago by RtpHarry in topic Resolution

Title edit

Is it "Yin 3 in 2D" or "Yang 3 in 2D"? As originally reported, it was Yang. Then it was Yin. Now, every source I can find is different. It's about half and half. Even the official website uses them interchangeably (main page, schedule pages, etc.). Which is correct? Kevinbrogers (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

According to Psych_USA on twitter, it is Yang 3 in 2D (http://twitter.com/Psych_USA/status/16908836644331521) Csmcdem (talk) 22:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can't use Twitter as a source. Currently, most sources report Yin, but we can change it later if the sources change. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Though I do see what you mean (where it says "Not Yin"). I think right now, we're going off the official schedule, which says "Yin." I'll check it frequently though to be sure. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Nevermind, the official schedule has changed to "Yang." I'll go through all the articles and change to Yang. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

robocop is Mr Yin edit

Peter Weller —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.83.232 (talk) 03:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Got it. Thanks. Kevinbrogers (talk) 04:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Summary edit

I added the summary from the USA website and tried to remove some trivial information, clarify certain details, and generally make it more encyclopedic. It may need to be re-written, because it still seems copy-pasted and doesn't flow (for lack of a better word) very well. --Boycool (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Resolution edit

My guess (no inside knowledge) is that Mr Yin is not dead. My original theory was that he was going to inject Gus and make Shawn do some task only to reveal Gus wasn't dead. The whole thing seemed a bit rushed.

Probably should have been Juliet that went back to the academy a few episodes ago as well because she let two bad girls get the drop on her when she should have had her guard up.

--RtpHarry (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply