Additional references edit

A laundry list of sources with which to improve the article

  • Google Scholar [1]
The current minimal uncontroversial content doesn't really need additional references (though they won't harm of course), all the inforation contained in it is sourced by the official website given in the article.--Kmhkmh (talk) 02:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

"references" removed edit

I removed the whole reference section since none of them were supporting an article statement.

They were being used as promotion space for math papers, but not supporting or improving verifiability of article.

One of them, for example was a Google books search that showed a single line, or this one which the only relation is a single line listing the mathematical programs available on some contest.

Magister Mathematicae (talk) 17:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

"stable release" edit

The article currently names version 1.1.2 as stable release. However, this release is in fact not stable until version 1.1.3 is released.

RobertPollak (talk) 13:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Because the article Xcas now has 27 sources one can think about removing the call for “additional citations”. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.88.195.49 (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Think about removing the call for “additional citations” Because the article Xcas now has 27 sources one can think about removing the call for “additional citations”. MacApps (talk) 18:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)MacAppsReply

Xcas is now a 64 bit app for Apple macOS edit

“ On Mac OS X.10, it is recommended to install this version “

Link:

https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/install_en#osx

" On Mac OS X.10, it is recommended to install this version "

MacApps (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC) MacAppsReply