This article was nominated for deletion on September 1 2008. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Please just give me a week to work on it. I can see why the article is not currently notable or verifiable, but I will make a big effort to change this. Thanks --Dumbassman (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editI am not sure why this article has been nominated for speedy deletion when it uses multiple sources that, in my estimate, pass the Reliable Source (RS) guidelines. I think the burden of proof here is on the nomination to delete.--Discott (talk) 20:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)