Talk:Womenomics

Notability

Non-notable book, seems to be advertising for the upcoming release. References provide no notability or substance to support article - a number do not even reference the book. ttonyb1 (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

I understand the concerns about Notability, and I'm familiar with the concept, but am still having trouble determining what to include to clear this up. One example of a Wikipedia page I was looking at for an example of an upcoming book that doesn't seem to be having Notability issues is Giving Is Living... is theirs notable because the book was noted by an article on ArtSlant? The ArtSlant piece is wholly advertisement-like, with phrases like "The economic crunch is no match for this book—Giving is Living provides 101 easy ways to improve our lives. It’s simple: by doing good for others, we can feel great and begin to live our best lives." Given that the only other references are to sites sponsored by the book itself, Giving Is Living seems to have no other real Notability? I'm trying to understand what makes that book Notable enough to warrant and page but not Womenomics. The Wall Street Journal published an editorial by the authors of Womenomics on the topic of Womenomics, the inclusion of which in the page I though would increase the evidence for its Notability? Thanks so much for your help! Jocelynp85 (talk) 03:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I've added a ref to the other good refs, and I think it's good enough to survive now. I'm declining the db-spam deletion. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 03:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Quite a transformation on the article, thanks for all the hard work. ttonyb1 (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Womanomics

Womenomics is a coined word that combines two words, "woman" and "economics". It's an economic promotion activities since 1999 based on a belief that introducing economy to women would thrive their economy leaded by all sort of organization including non profit organizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chika Ishii (talk • contribs) 11:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

The word was introduced by Ms. Kathy Matsui, the Strategist on Goldman Sachs in 1999. It seems an attempt to change the branches in macroeconomics and then to reconnect them. By newly established theories, building a new economy comparable to the traditional macroeconomic. The branch is starting from "women" as labor and consumers. Chika Ishii (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)