 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
editThe recent edits I made took out some material I thought was superfluous and (I believe), made it much more to-the-poin(talk) 19:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Kant66
I also recently deleted the last two blurbs near the end of the article since it was too much of an advertisement. I don't believe that it affected any of the substantive material in the article. (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC) Kant66
I just added another outside peer-reviewed reference to help establish that this article meets the general notability guidelines and to address the database's role in the larger literature. However, I am aware that these points might seem overly laudatory for a Wikipedia article, so if somebody tweaks it to make it less like an advertisement while still retaining the core point about its niche in the broader scholarship I would completely understand. I tried to do so myself but I'm not sure I succeeded.I also put the "users" section of the database directly under the database section, it seemed a more intuitive setup. On a side-note, I am disclosing that I have a potential conflict-of-interest as I work for WomanStats.[User:Kant66|Kant66]] (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)