 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Wolverine: The End page were merged into Alternate versions of Wolverine. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Canon
editIs it possible this was supposed to be canon prior to the events of M-Day? A future that was eliminated because Wolverine learned of his past after the events of House of M?
Also Wolverine has just killed Sabretooth in Wolverine vol. 3 #55 ilovemrdoe 00:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Merge
editRe-direct I propose a redirect of this page to Alternate versions of Wolverine#Wolverine: The End. This article is simply about an alternative version of Wolverine in the future. There is no reason to have an article describing this series here and also at the Alternative versions of Wolverine page. If we'd rather move the description of this series found at Alternative versions of Wolverine back to here and put a redirect notice at the Alternative versions of Wolverine, that'd be fine too. But I do not see the point of having two places that describe the same series. Faults of both descriptions aside, there just shouldn't be two attempted write-ups of the same series, both of which have problems. Combine the two either here or at the Alternative versions of Wolverine page. --RossF18 (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'll oppose for the minute. I think there are one or two possible places other than this for any merge, and at the minute I think it's quite acceptable to keep this article as it is. I think the issues the version at Alternate versions of Wolverine#Wolverine: The End have with our manual of style, plot summary policy and original research policy are better discussed in that article. They should not be re-introduced into this article. Hiding T 11:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose: This topic does warrant its own article, if it focuses on the conception of the series, critical reception, and sales figures (which I know exist). WesleyDodds (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Re-Direct The page contains no information that isn't already on the page Alternate Versions of Wolverine. In fact, there's more information on the Alternate Versions of Wolverine page. The work doesn't seem to merit its own article, as it doesn't appear to be particularly notable. It's just another of many, many non-canon stories set in the vast X-Men universe, just as unimportant as any other. -Lamarcus (talk) 00:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Re-Direct Nothing is of particular interest in this stand-alone article that is not already in the Alternate Versions of Wolverine page. Or if it isn't there it will be easy to move there. Re-Direct. Spidey104 (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Re-Direct
Sources
edit[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)