Talk:Whiskey Hill

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If you think the article's not notable, Erechtheus, be bold: submit it for deletion!

Certainly, the article would benefit from citations, and even from inclusion in other categories -- perhaps 19th-century structures of Loudoun County or some such. But a) it is hardly a stub, and b) the house seems to have a fairly rich and rich history. Wikipedia not being paper [1], this article seems to stand as a notable addition to the sum of knowledge that is WP. PRRfan 19:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not eager to just have this entry deleted, but I am not sure I understand what makes this place special. I see the photo. When was that building erected? By whom? Who lived there? It seems that there is a lot of less than helpful detail and a lot of helpful detail missing. My preference is always for articles to be saved by the addition of properly sourced information. That's why I didn't just go for an AfD in this case. It may eventually be the course I take, but I see no particular need to rush. Erechtheus 22:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How about citing some sources for this info? PRRfan (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic