Talk:Way of the Five Pecks of Rice/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back soon for a full review! Good luck! CarpetCrawler (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

GA passed

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

VERY well written, excellently sourced, and it definitely looks like a lot of hard work was put into this article. I cannot find any problems with it and thought it was a great read! Well done, and congratulations! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)