Talk:Wastage (military)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Article in need of neutrality--Piedras grandes 19:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2007-02-10 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- The military definition has not been defined in the Wiktionary entry. -- Ϫ 07:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Seems High
edit7000 a day on a quiet day would be around 10 million for the war, not counting anyone lost during actual operations. This seems high. Source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.50.137 (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Not just World War I
editThere is at least one example of the term being used in World War II. See "WAR CABINET, Defence Committee (Operations), ARMY STRENGTHS, Directive by the Minister of Defence," October 9, 1941. (p. 2, paragraph 4.), contemplating "a normal wastage of 50,000 [men] a quarter." U.S. National Archives, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/27579597/31/public?contributionType=transcription (Map Room Papers (Roosevelt Administration), 1942-1945; Message Files, 1942-1945; FDR to Churchill-March-April 1942) MrArtC (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)